Yes, wireless radiation can make people sick!
August 30, 2024
Over the years I’ve heard horrific stories of ill people being committed to psychiatric institutions because they experienced symptoms when they were exposed to electromagnetic fields.
The people who put them there claimed the problem was all in their heads.
Not so, say Peter Hensinger and Bernd Budzinski, in their insightful article called ‘Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation’.
Hensinger and Budzinski say, ‘[I]t is still claimed that electrohypersensitivity is a figment of the imagination and can be attributed to the nocebo effect. Is electrohypersensitivity psychological? Definitely not! It is not a mental illness. The medical-biological reasons for EHS have been proven.’
Among them is the fact that wireless radiation has been shown to cause oxidative stress, which leads to inflammation, which can contribute to symptoms such as headaches, fatigue and heart problems.
Not only do the authors explain how symptoms can occur, they go so far as to suggest that ‘[i]t would be abnormal if people with corresponding pre-existing conditions did not feel these changes or were not affected by them.’
Why do some people react to wireless radiation and not others?
Hensinger and Budzinski say, ‘The following principle applies: The external causes (e.g. radiation) act by means of the internal conditions. The state of the immune system and pre-existing conditions influence the risk of becoming ill from electromagnetic fields.20 Possible pre-exposures include toxins such as mercury, lead, aluminium, microplastics, viruses or pesticides. Together with electromagnetic fields, the total exposure can become so high that the body’s own balance (homeostasis) is disturbed and symptoms of illness occur.’
Hensinger and Budzinski point out that it’s only in recent decades that people have questioned the existence of EHS. Before that, they say, ‘the existence of sensitivity to radar and wireless radiation was not questioned for more than 70 years.’
Since then, two things have changed. The first is that wireless technologies have become hugely profitable. The second is that people with EHS are an uncomfortable reminder that the technology we’re addicted to might be harmful.
The authors explain, ‘As with any drug, the addict defends himself against criticism out of fear that his substance will be taken away from him. The electro-hypersensitive person is seen as a threat to their own digital (substitute) identity, which the smartphone provides. He is the personified guilty conscience. The rejection of criticism of negative effects is therefore based on a reflexive fear that one’s own media consumption, habits and comfort will be called into question by the victimized person.’
That leaves EHS sufferers in an untenable position.
Hensinger and Budzinski describe situation in Germany, but the same applies in Australia and elsewhere. They say, ‘The misinformation provided by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection on EHS as a mental disorder, coupled with the trivialisation that EMF is harmless to health below the limit values, encourages people to continue to use wireless devices without restriction and to show no consideration for EHS sufferers. … As a result, people with EHS are discriminated against, socially isolated and lonely.’
The authors explain that the German standard for radiation protection, as in Australia, is based on the flawed assumption that only the heating effects of radiation can damage the body. They point out that there are thousands of studies showing damage to the body at levels that are far below the standard’s limits.
What can be done?
‘The protection of the population and the protection of minorities for people with electrohypersensitivity require a precautionary policy, i.e. the education of consumers about risks, the possibilities of avoiding them, the implementation of the various technical possibilities for minimising radiation and the development of transmission technologies that are harmless to health. For medical and ecological reasons, the last wireless gaps must be preserved and even new “ mobile communication-free protection zones “ created … Electrohypersensitivity must be recognised as an illness,’ they say.
Peter Hensinger and Bernd I. Budzinski, ‘Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation’, Umwelt Medizin Gesellschaft 37, 2, 2024
You can download the paper from this site: https://www.diagnose-funk.org/...
Toxicity is linked to electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
You can detox the body naturally with our Activated Zeolite Powder.
You can see details here.
What else can you do?